<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>No Site C!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nositec.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Keep the Peace River Flowing! Say NO to the Site C Hydroelectric Dam Proposal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:26:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='nositec.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://nositec.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="No Site C!" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://nositec.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Hudson&#8217;s Hope Opposes Dam</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2009/05/19/hudsons-hope-opposes-dam/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2009/05/19/hudsons-hope-opposes-dam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site c dam hudsons hope peace river]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.ca/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EnergeticCity.ca May 19, 2009 The municipality of Hudson&#8217;s Hope is now on record as officially opposed to the development of the Site-C Dam on the Peace River. Council has passed a resolution, stating the District&#8217; opposition, after residents voiced their concerns at a public forum. Mayor Karen Anderson says, Hudson&#8217;s Hope opposition to the dam goes [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=94&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2009/05/19/hudsons-hope-opposes-dam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Environmentalists accuse minister of hypocrisy over dam proposal</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2009/05/13/environmentalists-accuse-minister-of-hypocrisy-over-dam-proposal/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2009/05/13/environmentalists-accuse-minister-of-hypocrisy-over-dam-proposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site c dam peace river shanker bend]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.ca/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grande Prairie Herald Tribune, May 13, 2009 FORT ST. JOHN, B.C. — Opponents of the province’s proposal to build the Site C hydroelectric dam are accusing Environment Minister Barry Penner of hypocrisy for opposing a proposed dam in Washington State while leaving Site C as an option. Penner filed for intervener status last month on [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=97&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2009/05/13/environmentalists-accuse-minister-of-hypocrisy-over-dam-proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site C Not a genuinely ‘clean’ source of energy</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/06/25/site-c-not-a-genuinely-%e2%80%98clean%e2%80%99-source-of-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/06/25/site-c-not-a-genuinely-%e2%80%98clean%e2%80%99-source-of-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC's Energy Needs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suzuki foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.wordpress.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Northeast News BC Hydro’s estimate is that the Site C reservoir “could contribute between 70,000 and 140,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions per year for approximately the first 10 years” (Feasibility Review, p. 6-47).  We need to wake up and stop pretending that Site C would provide clean energy; that it’s an exception to [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=46&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/06/25/site-c-not-a-genuinely-%e2%80%98clean%e2%80%99-source-of-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nositec.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/june-25b-2008.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Much confusion, little transparency’ from Hydro</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/06/25/%e2%80%98much-confusion-little-transparency%e2%80%99-from-hydro/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/06/25/%e2%80%98much-confusion-little-transparency%e2%80%99-from-hydro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Power Import/Export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydro dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.wordpress.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Northeast News The statement that BC was a net importer of electricity in 2006 is in direct contradiction with BC Hydro’s Annual Report for that year, which states that BC Hydro, through Powerex, exported more energy than it imported. Exports apparently make up 29,906 GWh, and imports make up 28,405 GWh. (BC Hydro&#8217;s Annual Report [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=42&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/06/25/%e2%80%98much-confusion-little-transparency%e2%80%99-from-hydro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nositec.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/june-25-2008.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damn if we do, damn if we don’t</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/damn-if-we-do-damn-if-we-don%e2%80%99t/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/damn-if-we-do-damn-if-we-don%e2%80%99t/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC's Energy Needs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydro dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind farm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.wordpress.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does B.C. need Site C? by the OminecaExpress.com The main reason for looking at the massive, $5 billion to $6.6 billion dam is to provide the province with additional “firm” power capacity. Firm capacity, as opposed to intermittent capacity, is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week — whether the sun is shining, the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=34&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/damn-if-we-do-damn-if-we-don%e2%80%99t/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hydro’s censorship tactics intolerable, says reader</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/hydro%e2%80%99s-censorship-tactics-intolerable-says-reader/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/hydro%e2%80%99s-censorship-tactics-intolerable-says-reader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC Energy Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.wordpress.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Northeast News Let&#8217;s step back a moment to look at the big picture. Here we have a Crown corporation (whose board of directors is hand-picked by the BC Cabinet) being mandated by that government to pursue the twice-killed Site C project. This company has been charged with the duty of ‘consulting’ with the public and [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=39&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/hydro%e2%80%99s-censorship-tactics-intolerable-says-reader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nositec.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/june-11b-2008.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Use of Site C meeting photos, film restricted</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/use-of-site-c-meeting-photos-film-restricted/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/use-of-site-c-meeting-photos-film-restricted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.wordpress.com/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Northeast News BC Hydro is refusing to allow public to use photos or film from its Site C public consultation meetings, the Northeast News has learned&#8230;. &#8220;The Site C team&#8217;s need to control what they twice announced at the beginning of the May 8 stakeholders&#8217; meeting as a ‘public meeting’ is an overt attempt to [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=36&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/use-of-site-c-meeting-photos-film-restricted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nositec.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/june-11-2008.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site C Foes Power Up</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/05/21/site-c-foes-power-up/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/05/21/site-c-foes-power-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west moberly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.wordpress.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  BC Hydro rendering of how a Site C dam might look   May 21 2008 Shot down in the 1980s, BC Hydro tests the public waters with new dam   Construction of a third large hydroelectric dam on the Peace River in British Columbia’s north is back on BC Hydro’s to-do list, and the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=31&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/05/21/site-c-foes-power-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www12.bcnewsgroup.com/portals/uploads/mondaymag/.DIR288/NewS.117.20080520194202.mini_SiteC_20080522.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://nositec.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/mondaymag_mountainmist.gif" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site C spills over</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/site-c-spills-over/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/site-c-spills-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 01:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Import/Export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[import]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.wordpress.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Bruce Lantz, North East News FORT ST. JOHN &#8211; The anger was evident as more than 50 people crammed into a room with BC Hydro officials to tell them what they thought of the Site C dam. It was one of 30 meetings and 10 open houses scheduled as phase two of the process [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=15&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/site-c-spills-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site C dam proposal moves ahead</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/site-c-dam-proposal-moves-ahead/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/site-c-dam-proposal-moves-ahead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 23:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BC's Energy Needs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[da]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.wordpress.com/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Fletcher &#8211; BC Local News VICTORIA – BC Hydro has completed the opening phase of a feasibility study on the construction of a third dam on the Peace River, estimating that the project could cost between $5 billion and $6.6 billion. That&#8217;s roughly twice the cost estimate given when the Site C project was [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=28&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/site-c-dam-proposal-moves-ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tab for Site C dam could hit $6.6 billion</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/tab-for-site-c-dam-could-hit-66-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/tab-for-site-c-dam-could-hit-66-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.wordpress.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BC Hydro says cost of facility won&#8217;t be known until final bid is accepted Scott Simpson, Vancouver Sun The construction cost for the controversial Site C dam project on the Peace River has increased by $3 billion since 2005 and could reach $6.6 billion, BC Hydro reported on Tuesday. Hydro cautioned in a new report [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=16&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/tab-for-site-c-dam-could-hit-66-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Site C Opponent</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/another-site-c-opponent/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/another-site-c-opponent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.wordpress.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ FSJ News You can add the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, to the list of Site C Dam opponents, albeit for different arguments than those voiced, by most other critics, to date. BC spokesperson Maureen Bader says, given the provincial government’s mega-project construction record, Site-C creates the potential, for multi-million dollar cost overruns. She argues, while in [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=29&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/another-site-c-opponent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dam it; Taxpayer-Funded Mega-Project Most Costly Alternative</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2007/08/14/dam-it-taxpayer-funded-mega-project-most-costly-alternative/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2007/08/14/dam-it-taxpayer-funded-mega-project-most-costly-alternative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 23:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.wordpress.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s Talk Taxes, Canadian Taxpayers Federation The on-again, off-again Site C hydro dam project in Northern BC should – pardon the pun – have the lights turned off permanently. Small hydro projects, built with private funds, have less impact on the environment and on taxpayers’ wallets than large dams built with taxpayers’ dollars. Building the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=25&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2007/08/14/dam-it-taxpayer-funded-mega-project-most-costly-alternative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government concern about Site C dam stalls power plan</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2005/12/08/government-concern-about-site-c-dam-stalls-power-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2005/12/08/government-concern-about-site-c-dam-stalls-power-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treaty 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.wordpress.com/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Simpson, Vancouver Sun BC Hydro&#8217;s ambitious 20-year plan for a multibillion-dollar makeover of British Columbia&#8217;s electricity system hit a major snag Thursday when the provincial government ordered Hydro to back off out of concern about the controversial Site C dam project. Hydro officials had little to say. Bob Elton, Hydro president and CEO, issued [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=24&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2005/12/08/government-concern-about-site-c-dam-stalls-power-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dam Raises Concerns</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2004/04/29/dam-raises-concerns/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2004/04/29/dam-raises-concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2004 00:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.wordpress.com/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Lowey &#8211; Business Edge B.C. Hydro will have a fight on its hands if it tries to build its long-shelved Site C dam on the Peace River ? and not just from the green brigade. According to documents filed with the B.C. Utilities Commission, B.C. Hydro would rely on the private sector to provide [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=30&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2004/04/29/dam-raises-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Environmental and financial consequences of Site C dam</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2004/04/22/environmental-and-financial-consequences-of-site-c-dam/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2004/04/22/environmental-and-financial-consequences-of-site-c-dam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finacial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.wordpress.com/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ruth-Ann Darnall, Vancouver Sun On April 8 in The Sun, David Black, chair of the B.C. Progress Board, presented his case for building Site C, a 900-megawatt hydro-electric dam on the Peace River in northeastern British Columbia. It sounded too good to be true. It probably is. There is more to the Site C story, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=26&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/2004/04/22/environmental-and-financial-consequences-of-site-c-dam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site C &#8211; The Dam of Self Sufficiency?</title>
		<link>http://nositec.wordpress.com/0205/12/15/site-c-the-dam-of-self-sufficiency/</link>
		<comments>http://nositec.wordpress.com/0205/12/15/site-c-the-dam-of-self-sufficiency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 0205 23:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>peacevalley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BC's Energy Needs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paddle for the Peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Import/Export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bc hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net importer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nositec.wordpress.com/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Horter, Dogwood Initiative Rumors about a revamped Site C proposal seem like a déjà vu. BC Hydro is once again trying to pave the pathway for the controversial Site C hydroelectric dam up in the Peace region of northern BC. They claim that this energy project will help lead our province towards energy self-sufficiency. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nositec.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3728349&amp;post=27&amp;subd=nositec&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nositec.wordpress.com/0205/12/15/site-c-the-dam-of-self-sufficiency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9a32cf44b0fc47e3205410417410b207?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">peacevalley</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
